Australasia's home for timber news and information

Calls of Bull with respect to Vic timber plantations

Mr Bull with State Leader of the Nationals Peter Walsh on a pre COVID tour of bushfire affected East Gippsland.

The Victorian State Government’s announcements around timber plantations in Eastern Victoria have been described as hollow and doing nothing for security of the local industry. Source: Timberbiz

“When you have the Construction Forestry Maritime Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU), slamming a Labor policy, it’s a fair indication it is seriously flawed,” Gippsland East Nationals MP Tim Bull said.

“The CFMMEU says the policy has ‘little substance and does nothing to provide certainty for the timber workers’, adding ‘it is no more than a mishmash of incoherent talking points’.

“The Union quite rightly says the plan to transition out of native forests will devastate workers and communities and that ‘pretending this plantation scheme will provide a future for workers and timber communities is a cruel hoax’.”

Mr Bull said that with plans to transition the native timber industry to plantation by 2030, he asked the Premier Dan Andrews in Parliament for the locations of the hardwood timber plantations (that take at least 30 years to mature), as they should be 20 years old now if they are to be harvestable by 2030.

“While the question specifically related to replacement hardwood timber, the answer I got back related to softwood plantations, blue gum plantations and reference to future plantations,” Mr Bull said.

“The Premier’s answer shows no understanding at all. Plantations of pine or blue gum do not replace mountain or alpine ash.”

“He provided no information on the location of the plantations containing the species that will replace our native hardwood industry and there is good reason for this – they do not exist.

“The Government is talking about transition to plantation, but there is nothing to transition to when it comes to these hardwood species that our markets demand.”

Mr Bull said it time Mr Andrews came clean on whether he intended to import this replacement timber from jurisdictions with less oversight or revisit this flawed 2030 deadline.

“Our timber families and communities deserve answers,” he said.