Forestry ministers of Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) countries have agreed to isolate the United States and Australia for using trade bans to tackle illegal logging through a “non-binding” accord. Source: The Jakarta Post
The ministers argued that the bans contravened the United Nations’ principles on promoting sustainable forest management in developing countries and World Trade Organization (WTO) anti-protectionism measures.
“A meeting of forestry ministers who are members of APEC has effectively isolated Australia and the US for legislating import bans on illegal timber products,” said Alan Oxley, chairman of free market NGO World Growth, commenting on the result of an APEC’s Forestry Ministerial Meeting in Peru.
Oxley said in a release that research by World Growth showed none of the standard claims about the extent of illegal logging were independently verifiable and most were based on biased claims by anti-forestry NGOs, particularly Greenpeace and World Wide Fund (WWF).
The US introduced the amended US Lacey Act in 2008, a provision that regulates the import and export of wood products to and from the US.
Australia has a similar regulation, which makes it a criminal offence to import timber and timber products containing illegally sourced timber or process Australian raw logs that have been illegally logged.
The two APEC countries are not the only ones using such an approach to battle illegal logging and log trading around the world, with the European Union (EU) Timber Regulation coming into effect in March.
Oxley said research showed that most illegal logging was due to poor land clearing for housing, firewood and food production.
He pointed out the standard solution to illegal logging was to raise living standards and not by halting forestry activities, and claimed that the APEC meeting showed the dominant opinion among Asia-Pacific nations.
The “non-binding” accord was made after allegations from NGOs that the regulations imposed by the US and Australia served more as non-tariff trade barriers to curb cheap, flourishing exports from developing countries penetrating their markets, and therefore violating WTO’s anti-protectionism measures.
Indonesia is to respect the accord and would not stop trading forestry produce with Australia and the US, the latter is Indonesia’s third biggest wood importers.
