Australasia's home for timber news and information

NZ Forest Growers R&D spend

Funds raised by forest growers for research and other industry activities are expected to total NZ$7,620,000 in 2015, about NZ$1 million more than budgeted. Source: Timberbiz

At the same time, administrative expenditure has been kept under tight control. This will allow the Forest Growers Levy Trust in 2016 to keep the levy rate on harvested logs to NZ27c/tonne for the second year in a row.

It will also enable the Trust to expand the work it does for all growers, according to chair Geoff Thompson.

“We are looking at innovative ways to communicate new technology and best practice to growers, especially the owners of smaller forests who may be unaware of the opportunities for increasing the profitability and environmental performance of their plantations,” he said.

“The successful technology transfer workshops we pioneered in 2015 will now be expanded as part of this initiative.”

Other new initiatives planned for 2016 include an industry census, the promotion of careers in forestry, and a study of the environmental effects of mechanical harvesting on steep hill country.

The census will be designed to capture the contribution forestry and wood processing makes to society so that the value of the sector is better understood by policymakers and the public at large.

“We can easily put an accurate figure on exports,” Mr Thompson said. “But forestry is much more than that. We don’t know how many people are employed in the sector, how many people own forests, the area of forests planted for erosion protection, the area of native wildlife habitat and so on.”

Mr Thompson said the Trust worked extremely well in 2015 and the commodity levy that funds its activities appears to have widespread support among growers.

“We have repaid the costs associated with the levy referendum in 2013 and thanks to a robust log harvest in 2015, we now hold sufficient reserves to meet our commitments to research and other providers through any unforeseen disruptions. It also puts us in a position to fund activities that have levy payer support, but didn’t fit within our original budget.”

The core activities of the Trust are research, biosecurity, safety, transport, fire prevention, industry promotion and advocacy. Of these, research is by far the biggest ticket item, with a budget of NZ$4,478,000.

Mr Thompson said that research into sustainable intensification of radiata forests – “growing more timber on the same area of land, without any harm to the environment” – is the area of greatest focus.

“This, together with other production forest research projects covering weed and disease control, the use of beneficial organisms and automated harvesting systems, are all designed to make forestry more profitable for levy payers and to protect the industry’s social licence to operate,” he said.

The Forest Health Surveillance Scheme (FHSS) is a vital part of the industry’s biosecurity strategy, with a budget of around NZ$800,000.

The scheme aims to detect new incursions before they can establish and cause significant damage, and to provide assurances to trading partners that the industry knows what’s living in its forests.

“Since the levy was established in 2014 we have, on expert advice, revised the scheme. We now survey forests throughout the country, rather than just those of FOA members, with an emphasis on areas of greatest risk,” he said.

“We have also better integrated the scheme with MPI’s biosecurity monitoring.

“In 2016, we will be developing an incursion response capability, so we can play our part under the biosecurity agreement we now have with the government – the GIA. This will include the development of models that will help us understand the economic implications of an incursion and to do cost-benefit analyses of the various control options.”

The Forest Industry Safety Council, established in 2015, will continue to be co-funded by the Trust, ACC and Worksafe.

The Trust’s share of NZ$575,000 means safety is seen as a major priority for levy funding, something Thompson says is entirely appropriate.

“We have seen a dramatic drop in serious harm injuries in the last 18 months, in part because of the initiatives the industry has put in place in that time,” Mr Thompson said.

“But we still have an obligation to ensure that everyone who works in our industry returns home safely after work every day. The Council’s work will be key to us achieving the industry’s goal of zero fatalities and zero serious harm injuries.”